Supporting The Development Of The Autonomy Of CEP Beneficiaries: Gaps Between The Prescriptions And Practices Of Advisers

Abstract

This article aims to contribute to the methods of supporting professional careers, by highlighting the gaps between the prescriptions and practices of advisers in supporting the autonomy of beneficiaries, provided for in the Professional Development Consulting (abbreviated by CEP) of 2014 and 2019. This mission of "empowering working people" (Guide Repères, 2015, 2017) is complex in that it is conceived as an aim and condition of support (for a working alliance) and very little institutionally framed, although determined by and for the needs of the beneficiaries (Author 2). Based on a survey carried out in [name of region] (Author 1), a corpus of 6 self-confrontation interviews in the Missions Locales and at the Pôle Emploi is analyzed using the theoretical framework of ergology (Durrive, 2012, 2014). The analysis of the interviews makes it possible to grasp the renormalization work in practices, around the values ​​carried by these advisers, some of which may go against the texts of the CEP. This analysis leads to questions about the professional posture and professionalization of CEP advisers, and the effects of practices on beneficiaries.